(Bloomberg) -- Major investors are opposing Woodside Energy Group Ltd.’s climate plans and the chairman’s reelection, raising questions about the strategy of Australia’s largest energy company as it rushes to expand oil and natural gas output.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Taylor Swift Is Proof That How We Critique Music Is Broken Tesla Stock in ‘No Man’s Land’ After 43% Rout Ahead of Earnings Tech Giants Roar as Tesla Spikes in Late Hours: Markets Wrap Ray Dalio’s Famous Trade Is Sputtering, Investors Bailing Billionaire Pinaults Fight to Pull Gucci Off the Discount Rack

Funds including the California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Australia’s Aware Super both voted against Richard Goyder’s reappointment and rejected proposals for emissions reduction before an annual meeting on Wednesday. Other shareholders backed directors but rejected the green plans.

Woodside’s climate plans have been criticized as too slow or unclear, and investors have raised objections to Goyder’s handling of those issues. Climate activists also oppose Woodside’s push to advance a $24 billion slate of expansion projects, including the flagship Scarborough liquefied natural gas development in Western Australia.

“We still have some ongoing concerns about Woodside’s plan to be net zero by 2050,” Shaun Manuell, head of Australian equities at AustralianSuper, the country’s largest pension fund and a holder of more than 3% of the producer, told a Parliamentary hearing Monday. “Based on that we’ve decided to vote against it and we’ll continue our discussions with the company.”

The results of the ballot on the climate plan are non-binding, though Woodside insists that it responds to investor feedback when developing its policies. Electronic voting instructions and voting forms were due by Monday, with full results expected at Wednesday’s meeting.

Woodside is targeting a 15% reduction to its net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 and 30% by 2030, it said in a presentation in February. The measure reflects the company’s share of jointly owned operations, includes the use of offsets and is relative to an annual average over 2016 to 2020.

Read More: Why ‘Scope’ Matters for Oil Companies Cutting Carbon: QuickTake

The company also aims to take investment decisions by 2030 on projects able to lower Scope 3 emissions by 5 million tons a year. That pollution — mainly from the burning of the fossil fuels it sells — is by far its biggest source of carbon dioxide pollution, at about 72.8 million tons in 2023, according to the company.

“Woodside’s net zero target is 500 words long and it’s incomprehensible,” Polly Hemming, director of the climate and energy program at the Australia Institute, a think tank that opposes new fossil fuel developments, told the Parliamentary hearing. “It’s like ChatGPT wrote it.”



The producer expects gas demand to rise 50% over the next decade, propelled by rising consumption in Asia. That bullish outlook helped spur Woodside’s failed attempt to merge with smaller rival Santos Ltd. in a tie-up that would’ve created one of the Asia-Pacific region’s biggest LNG producers.

Read More: Exxon Sues ESG Investors to Stop Climate Proposals on Ballot

“We are being honest about the energy transition,” Goyder told investors earlier this month in a letter ahead of the annual meeting. “We are concerned that some stakeholders’ and investors’ requests to drastically change Woodside’s strategy and investment priorities risk eroding value.”

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

A Hedge Fund Billionaire’s Cash Helped Fund a ‘Predatory’ Lender How a Massive Hack of Psychotherapy Records Revealed a Nation’s Secrets Big Junk Food’s Campaign to Get You Eating Doritos and Oreos for Dinner China’s Bubble Tea Boom Creates a Half-Dozen Billionaires Skip the Robotaxi—Tesla Investors Want a Cheap EV

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.